- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Marcus Willaschek, Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason
Idealistic Studies 50 (3):315-320 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Marcus Willaschek: Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics. The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018. XII, 298 Seiten. ISBN: 978-1-108-47263-0. [REVIEW]Giovanni Pietro Basile - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (1):133-139.
Kant and the Sources of Metaphysics: the Dialectic of Pure Reason, by Marcus Willaschek. [REVIEW]Andrew Stephenson - 2020 - Dialectica 74 (3):575–581.
Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics. The Dialectic of Pure Reason: by Marcus Willaschek, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 308, £75.00 (hb), ISBN: 9781108560856. [REVIEW]Lorenzo Spagnesi - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (3):570-573.
Kant on the sources of metaphysics: The dialectic of pure reason, by Marcus Willaschek. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 298pp. $105.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781108472630. [REVIEW]Johannes Haag - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):524-528.
Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason.Marcus Willaschek - 2018 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin.Marcus Willaschek - 2022 - Open Philosophy 5 (1):689-698.
Review of: Willaschek, M., Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics. The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. [REVIEW]Rudolf Meer - 2019 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (10):235-239.
Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason by Marcus Willaschek. [REVIEW]Markus Kohl - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (1):181-182.
The Many Faces of Transcendental Realism: Willaschek on Kant’s Dialectic. [REVIEW]Andrew Chignell - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):279-293.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-13
Downloads
1,033 (#52,404)
6 months
149 (#90,756)
2020-12-13
Downloads
1,033 (#52,404)
6 months
149 (#90,756)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How Many Types of Ideas Must be Considered to Reconstruct the Real Concept of Ideas in Kant?Michael Lewin - 2025 - Con-Textos Kantianos 22:235-242.
The Faculty of Ideas. Kant’s Concept of Reason in the Narrower Sense.Michael Lewin - 2022 - Open Philosophy 5 (1):340-359.
For a Dialectic-First Approach to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.James Kreines - 2022 - Open Philosophy 5 (1):490-509.
Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin.Marcus Willaschek - 2022 - Open Philosophy 5 (1):689-698.
Rudolf Meer, Der transzendentale Grundsatz der Vernunft. Funktion und Struktur des Anhangs zur Transzendentalen Dialektik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte Band 207, Berlin/boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2019, 314 pp. [REVIEW]Michael Lewin - 2021 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (3):562-570.
References found in this work
Reason in the World: Hegel's Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal.James Kreines - 2015 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.
Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion.Michelle Grier - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation