Russell’s Hidden Substitutional Theory

Philosophical Review 110 (1):138-141 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his 1903 Principles of Mathematics, Russell holds that “it is a characteristic of the terms of a proposition”—that is, its “logical subjects”—“that any one of them may be replaced by any other entity without our ceasing to have a proposition”. Hence, in PoM, Russell holds that from the proposition ‘Socrates is human’, we can obtain the propositions ‘Humanity is human’ and ‘The class of humans is human’, replacing Socrates by the property of humanity and the class of humans, respectively. Hence also, in PoM, Russell accepts the doctrine of the unrestricted variable: if we replace a logical subject of a proposition by a variable to yield a propositional function, the range of that variable includes absolutely every entity. For absolutely any entity can be taken as a value of that variable to yield a proposition, true or false. The doctrine of the unrestricted variable is thus incompatible with any type-theoretic metaphysics, according to which only entities of a certain restricted type can replace a logical subject of a given proposition so as to yield another proposition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Russell's hidden substitutional theory.Gregory Landini - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Review. Russell's hidden substitutional theory. G Landini.M. Byrd - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):357-362.
A study on proposition and sentence in english grammar.Mudasir A. Tantray - 2016 - International Journal Of Humanities and Social Studies 4 (02):20-25.
Russell-Myhill paradox.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wittgenstein and Russell.Graham Stevens - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman, A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 92–109.
Field's Paradox and Its Medieval Solution.Stephen Read - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (2):161-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
217 (#186,416)

6 months
62 (#149,279)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Levine
Trinity College, Dublin

Citations of this work

Why Ramify?Harold T. Hodes - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (2):379-415.
The functions of Russell’s no class theory.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
Russell, idealism, and the emergence of analytic philosophy.Peter Hylton (ed.) - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references