- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation: On the situation of women in science and philosophy
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:56-63 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
How to think about shared norms and pluralism without circularity: A reply to Anna Leuschner.Jaana Eigi - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75 (C):51-56.
Anna Leuschner: Die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wissenschaft. Eine wissenschafts- und erkenntnistheoretische Analyse am Beispiel der Klimaforschung. [REVIEW]Nicola Mößner - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (2):391-395.
Communal philosophy? A possible framework for academia-community interaction.Yael Silver & Ayelet Shavit - 2025 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 112 (C):161-169.
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science.Matteo Collodel - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:27-56.
The evolution of Pauli's exclusion principle.Gordon N. Fleming - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):202-208.
Does diversity promote exclusion?Yael Silver & Ayelet Shavit - 2025 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 112 (C):133-140.
Newtonian methodological abstraction.Michael Friedman - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72 (C):162-178.
Large language models for history, philosophy, and sociology of science: Interpretive uses, methodological challenges, and critical perspectives.Arno Simons, Michael Zichert & Adrian Wüthrich - 2026 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 117 (C):102151.
Article: M. Monteiro and A.Sneller, Choosing the better part, Anna Maria van Schurman (1607-1678), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.Francoise Monnoyeur - 1998 - Lychnos: Lärdomshistoriska Samfundets Årsbok = Annual of the Swedish History of Science 1998:284-285.
Methodological Elements of Keplerian Astronomy.Jürgen Mittelstrass - 1972 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3 (3):203.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
86 (#642,019)
6 months
13 (#935,850)
2016-02-04
Downloads
86 (#642,019)
6 months
13 (#935,850)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why Do Women Philosophy Students Drop Out of Philosophy? Some Evidence from the Classroom at the Bachelor’s Level.Catherine Herfeld, Jan Mueller & Kathrin von Allmen - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (51).
How institutional solutions meant to increase diversity in science fail.Inkeri Koskinen - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6).
Enhancing Online Feedback for Philosophers: Lessons from the Writing Centre.Kristin Rodier, Cara Violini & Sarah-Jean Watt - 2025 - Teaching Philosophy 48 (4):585-610.
Ist die Praxis bevorzugter Anstellung moralisch zulässig?Christine Bratu - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 7 (1):301-324.
References found in this work
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.
Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy.Helen E. Longino - 1996 - In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson, Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. pp. 39--58.
Values in Science.Ernan McMullin - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (4):3-28.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation