Evolution and the Missing Link (in Debunking Arguments)

In Michael Ruse & Robert J. Richards, The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are the consequences, for human moral practice, of an evolutionary understanding of that practice? By ‘moral practice’ we mean the way in which human beings think, talk and debate in moral terms. We suggest that the proper upshot of such considerations is moderate support for anti-realism in ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-06

Downloads
1,235 (#39,460)

6 months
211 (#47,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Neil Sinclair
Nottingham University
Uri D. Leibowitz
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Citations of this work

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Meet Evolutionary Science.Arnon Levy & Yair Levy - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (3):491-509.
A defence of the evolutionary debunking argument.Man Him Ip - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essays in quasi-realism.Simon Blackburn - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 52 references / Add more references