Extending bayesian concept learning to deal with representational complexity and adaptation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):685-686 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While Tenenbaum and Griffiths impressively consolidate and extend Shepard's research in the areas of stimulus representation and generalization, there is a need for complexity measures to be developed to control the flexibility of their “hypothesis space” approach to representation. It may also be possible to extend their concept learning model to consider the fundamental issue of representational adaptation. [Tenenbaum & Griffiths].

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Universal bayesian inference?David Dowe & Graham Oppy - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Exhuming similarity.Dedre Gentner - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.
What is the probability of the bayesian model, given the data?Evan Heit - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):672-673.
Conceptual Spaces, Generalisation Probabilities and Perceptual Categorisation.Nina L. Poth - 2019 - In Peter Gärdenfors, Antti Hautamäki, Frank Zenker & Mauri Kaipainen, Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 7-28.
Three deadly sins of category learning modelers.Bradley C. Love - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):687-688.
Tribute to an ideal exemplar of scientist and person.Dominic W. Massaro - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):688-689.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#462,383)

6 months
20 (#562,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references