Understanding the Self: How spatial parameters influence the distribution of anaphora within prepositional phrases

Cognitive Linguistics 24 (3):483-529 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates the distribution of reflexive and nonreflexive pronouns in the prepositional phrase, concluding that multiple semantic factors play a role in the appearance of one pronoun over the other. The distributional trends in English are explained by referencing the crucial role space plays in grammar, and the resulting implications for Binding Theory (Chomsky 1995) are discussed. The motivating forces for the corpus distribution are based on perceived directionality and location of the denoted event with respect to the body of the event's protagonist. The patterns found in the corpus data are attributed to a range of factors that play a role in the semantic specifications and associations of the pronouns themselves. First, it is argued that the high rate of reflexive pronouns in events that are metaphorically located in the body is due to the reflexive pronoun's close semantic association with the concept of self, a metaphorical body-internal entity. Second, it is argued that the reflexive pronoun is used to signal either an event which is performed on the body (in the referent's peri-personal space) or directed toward the body. Cases of these types are explained by a schematic, semantic parallelism between syntactically complex reflexive events and syntactically simple reflexive events. In both cases, the reflexive pronoun signals a contrastive element. In syntactically complex cases, the PP examples (e.g. John pushed the box toward himself), and syntactically simple cases, those with basic clause structure (e.g. John kicked himself), the reflexive is used to signal that the direction of the event is counter to the direction of expectation, thus explaining why certain reflexive events (e.g. bathe, or pull something toward you) do not have to, and most often, do not occur with the reflexive pronoun.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Covaluation and Unexpected BT Effects.Yael Sharvit - 2011 - Journal of Semantics 28 (1):55-106.
Philosophical Problems of the Binding Theory.Petr Kusly - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):120-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-18

Downloads
56 (#1,070,916)

6 months
10 (#1,162,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse, and empathy.Susumu Kuno - 1987 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reference-point constructions.Ronald W. Langacker - 1993 - Cognitive Linguistics 4 (1):1-38.
The syntax of anaphora.Ken Safir - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references