Blockchain and clockwork trust

Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 13 (1):139-148 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates the hypothesis that we can understand blockchain technology as a mechanization of trust. As inspiration, the author accesses the categories introduced by Bernard Stiegler, especially grammatizationand proletarianization. The reflection on the social relation of trust and its mechanization in processes based on blockchain technology develops in the direction of the analysis of the way social time is generated in the process of “digging”. The thesis is that blockchain is not only a mechanized ledger, but also has a more complicated function similar to the role played by subjectivities who generate social time in Jacques Lacan’s concept of logical time. Only the appearance of time modalities, present, past and future, can guarantee a common memory of the past, which is the condition of the possibility of trust.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What does it mean to trust blockchain technology?Yan Teng - 2022 - Metaphilosophy 54 (1):145-160.
Blockchain Ethics.Peter G. Kirchschlaeger - 2024 - Philosophies 9 (1):2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-12-12

Downloads
12 (#2,019,485)

6 months
11 (#1,048,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fanged Noumena: collected writings 1987-2007.Nick Land - 2012 - New York, NY: Sequence Press. Edited by Robin Mackay & Ray Brassier.
Repetition.Søren Kierkegaard - 2009 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by M. G. Piety, Edward F. Mooney & Søren Kierkegaard.

Add more references