Propositional proof systems, the consistency of first order theories and the complexity of computations

Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1063-1079 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the problem about the length of proofs of the sentences $\operatorname{Con}_S(\underline{n})$ saying that there is no proof of contradiction in S whose length is ≤ n. We show the relation of this problem to some problems about propositional proof systems

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
203 (#198,840)

6 months
62 (#147,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The complexity of propositional proofs.Nathan Segerlind - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):417-481.
Incompleteness in the Finite Domain.Pavel Pudlák - 2017 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 23 (4):405-441.
Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
The complexity of propositional proofs.Alasdair Urquhart - 1995 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):425-467.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas.A. J. Wilkie & J. B. Paris - 1987 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 35 (C):261-302.

Add more references