Debunking, Epistemic Achievement, and Undermining Defeat

American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (1):43-60 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet a necessary condition on undermining defeat called modal security. They conclude that evolution, therefore, does not debunk our moral beliefs. This article shows that modal security is false if knowledge is virtuous achievement. New information can undermine a given belief without providing reason to doubt that that belief is sensitive or safe. This leads to a novel conception of undermining defeat, and it shows that successful debunking of moral realism is possible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Modal Security.Justin Clarke-Doane & Dan Baras - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (1):162-183.
The Real Problem with Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Louise Hanson - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268):508-33.
Why There is No Darwinian Dilemma for Ethical Realism.William J. FitzPatrick - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain, Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 237-255.
Recalibrating evolutionary debunking.Justis Koon - 2024 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (2):456-478.
Debunking Evolutionary Debunking.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9:76-101.
Genealogical Debunking Arguments.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2020 - In Morality and Mathematics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 97-120.
Debunking Arguments: Mathematics, Logic, and Modal Security.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2017 - In Michael Ruse & Robert J. Richards, The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-18

Downloads
1,534 (#26,497)

6 months
278 (#29,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Klenk
University of Technology Nuremberg

Citations of this work

Moral realism, disagreement, and conceptual ethics.Michael Klenk - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (9):2884-2901.
Pragmatism and Moral Objectivity.Michael Klenk - 2021 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 13 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Being Realistic About Reasons.Thomas Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.

View all 76 references / Add more references