- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories’ PolyHeme® Trial.Robert M. Nelson, Nancy M. P. King & Ken Kipnis - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):5-8.
An open letter to institutional review boards considering northfield laboratories' polyheme® trial.Ken Kipnis, Nancy M. P. King & Robert M. Nelson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):18 – 21.
Accidental communities: Race, emergency medicine, and the problem of polyheme®.Karla F. C. Holloway - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):7 – 17.
Getting the ethics right regarding research in the emergency setting: Lessons from the polyheme study.Neal Dickert & Jeremy Sugarman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):153-169.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Defining the Scope of Implied Consent in the Emergency Department".Mark Graber & Raul Easton - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):3-4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”.Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):W3 - W5.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Broader View of Justice”.Nancy S. Jecker - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Coming Era of Nanomedicine”.Fritz Allhoff - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):1-2.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
142 (#305,579)
6 months
25 (#389,265)
2010-09-11
Downloads
142 (#305,579)
6 months
25 (#389,265)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Good and not so good medical ethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):71-74.
References found in this work
Accidental communities: Race, emergency medicine, and the problem of polyheme®.Karla F. C. Holloway - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):7 – 17.
What treatments are "satisfactory?" Divining regulatory intent and an ethical basis for exception to informed consent for emergency research.Robert Silbergleit, Drew Watters & Michael R. Sayre - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):24 – 26.
The role of community consultation in the ethical conduct of research without consent.Lynne D. Richardson, Rosamond Rhodes, Deborah Fish Ragin & Ilene Wilets - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):33 – 35.
Emergency research and consent: Keeping the exception from undermining the rule.Arthur R. Derse - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):36 – 37.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation