Material and More-than-Material Considerations

In Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships: Beyond Dualisms, Materialism and Posthumanism. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 221-230 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When assuming the possibility of a complementary, material and more-than-material relational ontology, various material facets of experience can actually work to support notions of ontologically irreducible more-than-material elements. In addition, by expunging human/nature dualisms, more-than-material evidence can also be gathered directly via Peircian shared feelings, poetic knowledge and personal acquaintance knowledge as detailed in the previous chapter. Lastly, more-than-material relational elements such as beauty, meaning, and the capacity to astonish are generally taken by modern theorists not to exist in relational participants or the relational space between them. Instead, they are thought to be post hoc concepts created by human or human-like participants in response to material relational conditions. This is erroneous, and such qualities should be taken to be more-than-material ontological elements irreducible to the material—ones that can be inherent in relational participants and/or the relationships themselves.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-06-08

Downloads
30 (#1,600,035)

6 months
11 (#1,043,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references