Problems with Forfeiture

In Total Collapse: The Case Against Responsibility and Morality. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 27-42 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Forfeiture theory of killing under Non-consequentialism, forfeiture theory, has serious problems. At the heart of morality is an Forfeitureattempt to tell people how to behave when there is conflict (for example, threats and violence). If forfeiture is the best non-consequentialist theory and it fails to provide an adequate account of conflict, then non-consequentialism fails at a task that is central to morality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Axiomatic Theory of Just War.Stephen Kershnar - 2017 - In Ryan Jenkins & Bradley Strawser, Who Should Die? The Ethics of Killing in War. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 118-141.
Defending Forfeiture Theory.Christopher Wellman - 2016 - In Rights Forfeiture and Punishment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 12-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-06-07

Downloads
38 (#1,418,451)

6 months
25 (#409,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references