One path to balance and order in social psychology: An evolutionary perspective

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):346-347 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consideration of the adaptive problems faced by our ancestors suggests functional reasons why people exhibit some biases in social judgment more than others. We present a taxonomy consisting of six domains of central social challenges. Each is associated with somewhat different motivations, and consequently different decision-rules. These decision-rules, in turn, make some biases inherently more likely to emerge than others.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two kinds of bias.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2025 - Mind and Society 24 (2):193-207.
More holes in social roles.Douglas T. Kenrick & Vladas Griskevicius - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):283 - 285.
Balance in psychological research: The dual process perspective.Keith E. Stanovich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):357-358.
Second-Order Decisions.Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 2017 - In Avishai Margalit & Cass R. Sunstein, Normal Rationality: Decisions and Social Order. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 39-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#891,846)

6 months
15 (#767,014)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references