A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies

Theory and Decision 29 (3):203-222 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three “real life” cases are considered in this paper to apply and compare the rankings obtained by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and other Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques such as Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), ELECTRE and Weighted Linear Assignment Method (WLAM). The results indicated that the AHP, SAW, and ELECTRE rankings do not differ significantly, however, the WLAM tends to exhibit more disagreement. However, because of the limited nature of this study, we do not suggest this as a general conclusion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
99 (#521,314)

6 months
13 (#897,743)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references