Conceivability and modality in Hume: A lemma in an argument in defense of skeptical realism

Hume Studies 29 (1):43--61 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the ramifications of Hume's view of the relation of conceivability to metaphysical possibility. It argues that the limitations Hume places of the representations involved in moves to conceivability to metaphysical possibility preclude any straightforward argument against full-blooded causal realism in Hume from conceivability. Furthermore, our finding certain states of affairs conceivable when they are not metaphysically possible is perfectly compatible with the thrust of the causal realist position.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Conceivability as the Standard of Metaphysical Possibility.Miren Boehm - 2024 - In Scott Stapleford & Verena Wagner, Hume and contemporary epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
How To Avoid Mis‐Reiding Hume's Maxim Of Conceivability.Lewis Powell - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):105-119.
Counter-Conceivability Again.Crispin Wright - 2018 - In Ivette Fred Rivera & Jessica Leech, Being Necessary: Themes of Ontology and Modality from the Work of Bob Hale. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 266-282.
Hume on Possibility and Necessity.David Eric Lightner - 1996 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Introduction: Conceivability and possibility.Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne, Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 1--70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-22

Downloads
404 (#121,022)

6 months
31 (#285,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Kail
Oxford University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references