Philosophical and Cognitive Aspects of Visual Metaphor in Political Discourse

RUDN Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):1086-1105 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The postmodern doctrine of the 21st century, as well as the development of technology have changed the structure and form of the text which has increasingly acquired features of polymodality. The research aims to the study the visual metaphor, its philosophical and cognitive foundations in the political discourse exemplified in three linguacultures: American, British and Chilean. The research provides a definitional analysis of the concept of ‘visual metaphor’ and offers an overview of foreign research in the field. Cognitive aspects of visual metaphor are studied on the basis of conceptual and methodological approaches of the authors of cognitive metaphor G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, the theory of dual coding A. Paivio, philosophical reflections are based on the works of E. Cassirer, F. Nietzsche, U. Eco, R. Barth, Yu.M. Lotman. For the purpose of the present research methodology of analysis of visual metaphor with subsequent parameters were developed, which includes research methods of cognitive linguistics, semiotics and cultural studies. The presented methodology allows to analyze polymodal texts of political discourse, identify types of cognitive metaphors, analyze the structure of the sign, and reveal internal mechanisms of public opinion manipulation in the context of political discourse. The practical material of the study is represented by 30 political cartoons which were selected using the continuous sampling method, dedicated to political leaders of the USA (D. Trump), Great Britain (B. Johnson), Chile (S. Piñera) and above all are monomodal, i.e. contain only a visual code. To secure the research outcomes one more criterion to the cartoons was applied - they were supposed to depict political leaders in the metaphoric mode. The selected material was parameterized according to the developed methodology for analyzing the visual metaphor with each of the criteria described in detail. The study concludes with a comparative analysis of the visual metaphor in the political discourse of three linguacultures - American, British and Chilean - common features are highlighted, and differences are analyzed, the basis of which lie in the cultural and historical perspective, ethnic traditions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Visuality of Metaphors.Michalle Gal - 2020 - Cognitive Linguistic Study 7 (1):58 - 77.
A Semiotic Analysis of Arab Political Cartoons on U.S. President Trump.Abdulazeez Jaradat, Ahmad S. Haider, Israa Al-Qudah & Mohammed Dagamseh - forthcoming - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-10-26

Downloads
16 (#1,925,048)

6 months
12 (#963,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
Concepts of Consciousness.Ned Block - 2002 - In David John Chalmers, Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 206-218.

Add more references