Some Remarks on Kim-Dividing in Natp Theories

Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-24 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note, we prove that Kim-dividing over models is always witnessed by a coheir Morley sequence, whenever the theory is NATP. Following the strategy of Chernikov and Kaplan [8], we obtain some corollaries which hold in NATP theories. Namely, (i) if a formula Kim-forks over a model, then it quasi-divides over the same model and (ii) for any tuple of parameters b and a model M, there exists a global coheir p containing $\text {tp}(b/M)$ such that for all $b'\models p|_{MB}$. We also show that for coheirs in NATP theories, condition (ii) above is a necessary condition for being a witness of Kim-dividing, assuming that a witness of Kim-dividing exists (see Definition 4.1 in this note). That is, if we assume that a witness of Kim-dividing always exists over any given model, then a coheir $p\supseteq \text {tp}(a/M)$ must satisfy (ii) whenever it is a witness of Kim-dividing of a over a model M. We also give a sufficient condition for the existence of a witness of Kim-dividing in terms of pre-independence relations. At the end of the article, we leave a short remark on Mutchnik’s recent work [17]. We point out that the class of N- $\omega $ -DCTP $_2$ theories, a subclass of the class of NATP theories, contains all NTP $_2$ theories and NSOP $_1$ theories. We also note that Kim-forking and Kim-dividing are equivalent over models in N- $\omega $ -NDCTP $_2$ theories, where Kim-dividing is defined with respect to invariant Morley sequences, instead of coheir Morley sequences as in [17].

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Independence over arbitrary sets in NSOP1 theories.Jan Dobrowolski, Byunghan Kim & Nicholas Ramsey - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (2):103058.
On Rank Not Only in Nsop $_1$ Theories.Jan Dobrowolski & Daniel Max Hoffmann - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (4):1669-1702.
Independence Relations in Abstract Elementary Categories.Mark Kamsma - 2022 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 28 (4):531-531.
Nsop $_1$ -Like Independence in Aecats.Mark Kamsma - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (2):724-757.
Three Surprising Instances of Dividing.Gabriel Conant & Alex Kruckman - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-20.
Weak canonical bases in nsop theories.Byunghan Kim - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (3):1259-1281.
Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.
The kim–pillay theorem for abstract elementary categories.Mark Kamsma - 2020 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 85 (4):1717-1741.
On Stable Kim-Forking and Rosy Theories.Alberto Miguel-gómez - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-10-23

Downloads
50 (#1,179,082)

6 months
30 (#310,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theories without the tree property of the second kind.Artem Chernikov - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):695-723.
On model-theoretic tree properties.Artem Chernikov & Nicholas Ramsey - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (2):1650009.
A geometric introduction to forking and thorn-forking.Hans Adler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):1-20.
Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.
On ◁∗-maximality.Mirna Džamonja & Saharon Shelah - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 125 (1-3):119-158.

View all 14 references / Add more references