Some recent work on the problem of law

Philosophy of Science 34 (4):363-381 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely agreed that ‘scientific law’ is one of the key scientific terms which any adequate philosophy of science must attempt to clarify or define. The importance of the concept ‘law’ is made evident by the fact that the distinctive functions of science—explanation and prediction—are usually analyzed with reference to laws. Thus events are explained by showing that descriptions of them are deducible from laws, and laws are utilized in deducing descriptions of unknown future events, thereby permitting their prediction. Moreover, it has recently become clear that the concept ‘law’ is relevant to the analysis of counterfactual conditionals, disposition terms, and the physical modalities. An adequate explication of ‘law’, then, will further the analysis of these important concepts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Covering law explanation.Thomas Nickles - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):542-561.
Does Science Need Laws of Nature?Rani Lill Anjum & Stephen Mumford - 2018 - In Rani Lill Anjum & Stephen Mumford, Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 146-154.
The concept of physical law.Norman Swartz - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The meta‐theoretic conception of laws.John T. Roberts - 2008 - In The Law Governed Universe. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 80-141.
Scientific Laws.Lars-Göran Johansson - 2026 - In Philosophy of Science for Scientists. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 181-195.
Causality, Determinism and Probability.J. E. Moyal - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):310 - 317.
Hume on scientific law.Chester T. Ruddick - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (2):89-93.
A Physicalist Theory of Scientific Theoretical Explanation.Gilbert Bruce Fargen - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
199 (#202,569)

6 months
34 (#260,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The universality of laws.John Earman - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):173-181.
A pragmatic analysis of idealizations in physics.William F. Barr - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (1):48-64.
An examination of Reichenbach on laws.H. A. Lauter - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (1):131-145.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
What is a Law of Nature?A. J. Ayer - 1956 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 10 (2=36):144.
Nomological statements and admissible operations.Hans Reichenbach - 1954 - Amsterdam,: North-Holland Pub. Co..
Kinds and criteria of scientific laws.Mario Bunge - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):260-281.

View all 9 references / Add more references