Who's arguing? A call for reflexivity in bioethics

Bioethics 24 (5):256-265 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we set forth what we believe to be a relatively controversial argument, claiming that 'bioethics' needs to undergo a fundamental change in the way it is practised. This change, we argue, requires philosophical bioethicists to adopt reflexive practices when applying their analyses in public forums, acknowledging openly that bioethics is an embedded socio-cultural practice, shaped by the ever-changing intuitions of individual philosophers, which cannot be viewed as a detached intellectual endeavour. This said, we argue that in order to manage the personal, social and cultural embeddedness of bioethics, philosophical bioethicists should openly acknowledge how their practices are constructed and should, in their writing, explicitly deal with issues of bias and conflict of interest, just as empirical scientists are required to do.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Bioethics and conflicts of interest.Richard E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):155-165.
Bioethics and conflicts of interest.Richard E. Ashcroft - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):155-165.
Empirical Research in Bioethics.Margaret Pabst Battin - 2005 - In Margaret Pabst Battin, Ending Life: Ethics and the way we die. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 316-320.
Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?Chris Herrera - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):137–146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-04

Downloads
212 (#190,298)

6 months
27 (#362,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?