Reevaluating scientific progress as a problem resolution

Azafea: Revista de Filosofia 16:133-147 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Problem-solving” as a criterion of scientific progress defended by Thomas S. Kuhn and Larry Laudan, respectively, has been criticized by several authors. Recently, Alexander Bird has suggested that problem-solving as a criterion of scientific progress is regressive and anti-intuitive. In this text I reassess Kuhn, Laudan and Bird’s positions and I show that Bird’s arguments are untenable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Progressing Bird’s account of scientific progress.Kevin McCain - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-6.
Research traditions, incommensurability and scientific progress.David Pearce - 1984 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):261-271.
Pure science and the problem of progress.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:55-63.
A New Functional Approach to Scientific Progress.Yafeng Shan - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (4):739-758.
Kuhn, Relativism and Realism.Howard Sankey - 2017 - In Juha Saatsi, The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. New York: Routledge. pp. 72-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-16

Downloads
45 (#1,274,879)

6 months
6 (#1,537,359)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Damian Islas
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations