Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl

In Alfred Schramm, Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 7-36 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both Alexius Meinong and Edmund Husserl wrote about relations in their early works, in periods in which they were still influenced by Franz Brentano. However, besides the split between Brentano and Meinong, the latter also accused Husserl of plagiarism with respect to the theory of relations. Examining Meinong’s and Husserl’s early works and the Brentanist framework they were written in, we will try to assess their similarities and differences. As they shared other sources besides Brentano, we will consider very carefully whether we should speak at all of influence or plagiarism. Despite Meinong’s accusations it seems that both he and Husserl took over some elements from Brentano and, partially through him, from John Stuart Mill, who appears to be the most probable source on relations.

Other Versions

original Ierna, Carlo (2009) "Relations in the early works of Meinong and Husserl". Meinong Studies 3():7-36

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-07-28

Downloads
31 (#1,576,690)

6 months
23 (#437,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlo Ierna
Vrije University

References found in this work

P.Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn - 2005 - In Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn, Deutsche Biographische Enzyklopädie der Theologie und der Kirchen (DBETh). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Saur. pp. 1023-1076.
Briefwechsel.Edmund Husserl - 1994 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Edited by Elisabeth Schuhmann & Karl Schuhmann.

View all 24 references / Add more references