General Conclusion

In Renaud Wallenhorst Hetier & Nathanaël Wallenhorst, Philosophy of Education in the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 231-250 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We now propose to identify some of the contributions that would be made by the type of educational approach that we propose for teaching in the Anthropocene. We shall examine these contributions at the three levels that define the educational sciences as a discipline: conceptual, theoretical, and paradigmatic. Thus, in synthetic form, this conclusion contains the essence of our proposals as set out previously.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

General Conclusion.Ilya Kasavin - 2022 - In A Social Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. pp. 302-306.
General Conclusion.Louis Roy - 2016 - In Engaging the Thought of Bernard Lonergan. Chicago: McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 235-236.
General Conclusion.Louise Marcil-Lacoste - 1982 - In Claude Buffier and Thomas Reid: Two Common-Sense Philosophers. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 153-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-06-24

Downloads
12 (#2,019,602)

6 months
7 (#1,400,515)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Maimonides’ Demonstrations.Josef Stern - 2001 - Medieval Philosophy & Theology 10 (1):47-84.
There is No Verb for History.Nancy Partner - 2016 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 37 (2):325-349.
La Evolución Democrática. [REVIEW]William R. Shepherd - 1920 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (18):501-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references