Debate, Language and Incommensurability: The Popper—Adorno Controversy

Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 11 (1):3-15 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The controversy between Popper and Adorno at the conference held by the German Sociological Association at Tübingen in 1961, brought into focus issues that had been simmering for some years, and which were to go far beyond methodological dispute, into the foundational question of the relation between theory and society. The concept of totality and its concomitant totalitarian moral implications provide the initial focus, and it is argued that the apparent incommensurability of the two attitudes towards this concept derives not merely from substantive theoretical differences, but from distinct modes of theorizing through language. This in turn, has implications for the understanding of their respective constructions of, and relations to, reality. A comparative analysis of statements made by both men reveals the essentially monologic nature of one orientation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-16

Downloads
56 (#1,071,613)

6 months
6 (#1,502,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Critique of Social Reason in the Popper-Adorno Debate.Iaan Reynolds - 2023 - History of the Human Sciences 36 (3-4):260-282.
A Case of Creative Misreading: Habermas's Evaluation of Gadamer's Hermeneutics.Alan R. How - 1985 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 16 (2):132-144.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Concept of Totality in Lukacs and Adorno.Martin Jay - 1977 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1977 (32):117-137.

Add more references