Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God

International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):355 - 375 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas of Aquino, from the time he wrote his commentary on the ’Sentences’ through writing the ’Summa of Theology’, recognized how far beyond Aristotle’s was the rational theology of Avicenna. After perfecting his approach to proving the existence of God in the "five ways," Aquinas further developed Avicenna’s organization for treating God’s nature by simplifying Avicenna’s often convoluted thought and added his own developments in content and order. In sum, Aquinas’s treatment of God’s nature depends closely upon Avicenna’s treatment of the subject in his ’Metaphysics’ 8.3-7, even more so than upon Aristotle. This conclusion can be seen by comparing the doctrines of Aristotle, Avicenna and Aquinas on the divine nature

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-17

Downloads
157 (#267,104)

6 months
26 (#367,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rollen Edward Houser
University of St. Thomas, Texas

References found in this work

Necessary Existence.Alexander R. Pruss & Joshua L. Rasmussen - 2018 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Edited by Joshua L. Rasmussen.
Avicenna.L. E. Goodman - 2013 - Routledge.

Add more references