- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Does Macroeconomics Need Microfoundations
In Daniel M. Hausman, The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 315--333 (1984)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Causality in macroeconomics, by Kevin D. Hoover. Cambridge university press, 2002, XIII + 311 pages. [REVIEW]D. R. Cox - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):223-226.
The methodology of empirical macroeconomics by Kevin D. Hoover. Cambridge university press 2001, XII + 186 pages. [REVIEW]Julian Reiss - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):226-233.
A review of two books by Kevin D. Hoover: Causality in Macroeconomics and The Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics. [REVIEW]D. M. Hausman - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (2):259-270.
Complexity, causality, and expectations: Why macroeconomics needs a program of empirical microfoundations.Tobias Henschen - forthcoming - Politics, Philosophy and Economics.
Why Are “Microfoundations” Irrelevant? An Argument for Reorienting the Debate.Kobi Finestone - 2026 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 56 (2):177-194.
Foundations or Bridges? A review of J. E. King's The microfoundations delusion: metaphor and dogma in the history of macroeconomics. Edward Elgar, 2012, 304 pp.Kevin D. Hoover - 2013 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):88.
Reductionism in Economics: Intentionality and Eschatological Justification in the Microfoundations of Macroeconomics.Kevin D. Hoover - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):689-711.
Why macroeconomics does not supervene on microeconomics.Brian Epstein - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (1):3-18.
A deeper struggle for the soul of economics.Sheila Dow - 2021 - Journal of Economic Methodology 30 (2):90-93.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-01
Downloads
2 (#2,335,410)
6 months
2 (#1,995,406)
2014-02-01
Downloads
2 (#2,335,410)
6 months
2 (#1,995,406)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
When the “realism of assumptions” mattered: Milton Friedman's critique of the Phillips curve.Marcos Picchio - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 94 (C):8-16.
Lucasian Microfoundations as a Form of Structural Realism.Peter Galbács - 2021 - Filozofia Nauki 29 (3):9-35.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation