Rights and Worlds: On the Political Significance of Belonging

Philosophical Forum 45 (4):355-373 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modernity is characterized by an assertion of the individual as a singular unit of significance, and its various systems (political, legal, economic, etc.) take their lead from a commitment to the individual as the bearer of rights. While a powerful accomplishment, this idea is also problematic: it does not adequately recognize how the individual it prioritizes would itself point to other contexts of significance by which its experience is rendered meaningful. This paper explores this basic tension between these two visions of selfhood: one expressed in terms of “rights” and the other in terms of “worlds.” It will show how care for “worlds” is necessary for the very operation of rights, and it will identify various ways in which these “worlds” could be politically protected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-21

Downloads
81 (#700,266)

6 months
13 (#888,013)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shannon Hoff
Memorial University of Newfoundland

References found in this work

Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice.Joel Anderson & Axel Honneth - 2005 - In John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 127-149.

Add more references