A Nonmonotonic Sequent Calculus for Inferentialist Expressivists

In Pavel Arazim & Michal Dancak, The Logica Yearbook 2015. College Publications. pp. 87-105 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am presenting a sequent calculus that extends a nonmonotonic consequence relation over an atomic language to a logically complex language. The system is in line with two guiding philosophical ideas: (i) logical inferentialism and (ii) logical expressivism. The extension defined by the sequent rules is conservative. The conditional tracks the consequence relation and negation tracks incoherence. Besides the ordinary propositional connectives, the sequent calculus introduces a new kind of modal operator that marks implications that hold monotonically. Transitivity fails, but for good reasons. Intuitionism and classical logic can easily be recovered from the system.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A First-Order Sequent Calculus for Logical Inferentialists and Expressivists.Shuhei Shimamura - 2019 - In Igor Sedlár & Martin Blicha, The Logica Yearbook 2018. College Publications. pp. 211-228.
A Nonmonotonic Modal Relevant Sequent Calculus.Shuhei Shimamura - 2017 - In Alexandru Baltag, Jeremy Seligman & Tomoyuki Yamada, Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2017, Sapporo, Japan). Springer. pp. 570-584.
When Structural Principles Hold Merely Locally.Ulf Hlobil - 2017 - In Arazim Pavel & Lávička Tomáš, The Logica Yearbook 2016. College Publications. pp. 53-67.
L-domains as locally continuous sequent calculi.Longchun Wang & Qingguo Li - 2024 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (3):405-425.
A multi-succedent sequent calculus for logical expressivists.Daniel Kaplan - 2018 - In Pavel Arazim & Tomas Lavicka, The Logica Yearbook 2017. College Publications. pp. 139-153.
Speech Acts, Categoricity, and the Meanings of Logical Connectives.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):445-467.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-03

Downloads
1,300 (#36,020)

6 months
176 (#71,245)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ulf Hlobil
Concordia University

Citations of this work

A General Schema for Bilateral Proof Rules.Ryan Simonelli - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (3):1-34.
Why Must Incompatibility Be Symmetric?Ryan Simonelli - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2):658-682.
The Laws of Thought and the Laws of Truth as Two Sides of One Coin.Ulf Hlobil - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (1):313-343.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reason in philosophy: animating ideas.Robert B. Brandom - 2009 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139 - 164.
Tonk, Plonk and Plink.Nuel D. Belnap - 1962 - Analysis 22 (6):130-134.
The province of logic.William Kneale - 1956 - Mind 66 (262):258.

View all 9 references / Add more references