No positive duties for knowledge-firsters

Analysis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several proponents of the knowledge-first programme have argued that one has an obligation to believe that p if one is in a position to know that p. I argue that this is false since obligations agglomerate but being in a position to know does not. Moreover, I demonstrate that if one is obligated to believe that which one is in a position to know, then self-reflective subjects are practically always obligated to believe p and obligated to believe that they do not know that p. Finally, I suggest that this argument generalizes to many candidate positive epistemic obligations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-07-26

Downloads
259 (#160,899)

6 months
158 (#84,176)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jaakko Hirvelä
University of Helsinki (PhD)

Citations of this work

Ethics of Doxastic Conduct.Jaakko Hirvelä & Säde Hormio - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
A modal theory of justification.Jaakko Hirvelä - 2025 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 110 (3):1031-1045.
Zetetic supererogation.Jaakko Hirvelä - 2024 - Philosophical Issues 34 (1):167-183.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Justification and the Truth-Connection.Clayton Littlejohn - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Between Probability and Certainty: What Justifies Belief.Martin Smith - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Why Double-Check?Elise Woodard - 2024 - Episteme 21 (2):644-667.
Epistemic norms on evidence-gathering.Carolina Flores & Elise Woodard - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (9):2547-2571.

View all 31 references / Add more references