- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A cross-situational test of utility theory
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):324-324 (1983)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Exploring the Robustness of Cross-Situational Learning Under Zipfian Distributions.Paul Vogt - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (4):726-739.
Competitive Processes in Cross‐Situational Word Learning.Daniel Yurovsky, Chen Yu & Linda B. Smith - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):891-921.
Detailed Behavioral Analysis as a Window Into Cross-Situational Word Learning.Sumarga H. Suanda & Laura L. Namy - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (3):545-559.
Cross-Situational Learning: An Experimental Study of Word-Learning Mechanisms.Kenny Smith, Andrew D. M. Smith & Richard A. Blythe - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (3):480-498.
Learning Times for Large Lexicons Through Cross‐Situational Learning.Richard A. Blythe, Kenny Smith & Andrew D. M. Smith - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (4):620-642.
Retrieval Dynamics and Retention in Cross‐Situational Statistical Word Learning.Haley A. Vlach & Catherine M. Sandhofer - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (4):757-774.
Situational instructions and task order in recall for completed and interrupted tasks.David G. Hays - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (6):434.
A test of generalized expected utility theory.Barry Sopher & Gary Gigliotti - 1993 - Theory and Decision 35 (1):75-106.
Some quantitative concepts of value and utility from a utilitarian point of view.C. L. Sheng - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (2):175-195.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
91 (#591,708)
6 months
20 (#533,870)
2014-01-20
Downloads
91 (#591,708)
6 months
20 (#533,870)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Resolving the contradictions of addiction.Gene M. Heyman - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):561-574.
Addiction is not as puzzling as it seems.Jim Orford - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):591-592.
Matching and melioration as accounts of reinforcement and drug addiction.Marc N. Branch - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):577-578.
Relationship between melioration and the controlling variables.Richard A. Meisch & Ralph Spiga - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):588-589.
How do people choose between local and global bookkeeping?George Ainslie - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):574-575.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Maximization theory in behavioral psychology.Howard Rachlin, Ray Battalio, John Kagel & Leonard Green - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):371-388.
The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior.J. E. Staddon & Virginia L. Simmelhag - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (1):3-43.
Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.John Gibbon - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (3):279-325.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation