Case and Series: Medical Knowledge and Paper Technology, 1600–1900

History of Science 48 (3-4):287-314 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Development of Philosophy of Science 1600–1900.Ernan McMullin - 1989 - In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie & M. J. S. Hodge, Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge. pp. 816--837.
D. J. Bryden, Scottish Scientific Instrument-makers 1600-1900. - 1984 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 37 (1):87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
185 (#218,849)

6 months
36 (#241,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Natural history and information overload: The case of Linnaeus.Staffan Müller-Wille & Isabelle Charmantier - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):4-15.
Technoscientific approaches to deep time.Marco Tamborini - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 79 (C):57-67.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Medicine and the Reign of Technology.Stanley Joel Reiser - 1980 - Journal of the History of Biology 13 (1):160-161.
Humanist Methods in Natural Philosophy: The Commonplace Book.Ann Blair - 1992 - Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (4):541-551.
The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine.Andrew Cunningham, Perry Williams & Bernardino Fantini - 1994 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
Bericht.V. A. Geroimenko & F. Haney - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (2):349-355.

View all 6 references / Add more references