Models of decision-making and the coevolution of social preferences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):838-855 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We would like to thank the commentators for their generous comments, valuable insights and helpful suggestions. We begin this response by discussing the selfishness axiom and the importance of the preferences, beliefs, and constraints framework as a way of modeling some of the proximate influences on human behavior. Next, we broaden the discussion to ultimate-level (that is evolutionary) explanations, where we review and clarify gene-culture coevolutionary theory, and then tackle the possibility that evolutionary approaches that exclude culture might be sufficient to explain the data. Finally, we consider various methodological and epistemological concerns expressed by our commentators.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Economic models are not evolutionary models.Roger J. Sullivan & I. I. I. Henry F. Lyle - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):836-836.
A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
333 (#135,812)

6 months
66 (#143,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Original Edition.John Rawls - 1971 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
The Ethics of Authenticity.Charles Taylor - 1991 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
The Tragedy of the Commons.Garrett Hardin - 1968 - Science 162 (3859):1243-1248.

View all 28 references / Add more references