Public Trust of Experts in Democratic Societies: Lessons from Follett and Dewey

Philosophy of Science:1-10 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is commonly thought that there is a crisis of public trust in scientific experts. The traditional role of the expert as passing down the knowledge required to inform the public and resolve policy disputes faces both empirical and conceptual challenges. Relying on earlier ideas of Mary Parker Follet and John Dewey concerning the roles of experts in democratic decision making, we propose an approach to rebuilding trust involving nonhierarchical communication and collaboration between experts and the public. These historical views inform a model of the coproduction of knowledge and policy decisions that can improve the contemporary situation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experts vs Society.Olga A. Shapiro & Elena G. Shkorubskaya - 2024 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 61 (4):129-145.
Scientific Experts, Epistemic Wisdom and Justified Trust.Pierluigi Barrotta & Roberto Gronda - 2024 - In Michael M. Resch, Nico Formanek, Ammu Joshy & Andreas Kaminski, The Science and Art of Simulation: Trust in Science. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 81-93.
Skepticism and the Value of Distrust.Maria Baghramian & Silvia Caprioglio Panizza - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-05-30

Downloads
9 (#2,096,371)

6 months
9 (#1,211,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sunny Heenen
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale
Matthew J. Brown
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references