Partiality and prejudice in trusting

Synthese 191 (9) (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

You can trust your friends. You should trust your friends. Not all of your friends all of the time: you can reasonably trust different friends to different degrees, and in different domains. Still, we often trust our friends, and it is often reasonable to do so. Why is this? In this paper I explore how and whether friendship gives us reasons to trust our friends, reasons which may outstrip or conflict with our epistemic reasons. In the final section, I will sketch some related questions concerning trust based on the trustee’s race, gender, or other social identity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Insult and Injustice in Epistemic Partiality.Jack Warman - 2025 - Journal of Value Inquiry:707-727.
Lying Among Friends.Jorah Dannenberg - 2018 - In Eliot Michaelson & Andreas Stokke, Lying and Insincerity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lying Among Friends.Jorah Dannenberg - 2018 - In Michaelson Eliot & Stokke Andreas, Lying: Language, Knowledge, Ethics, and Politics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 206-226.
Epistemic Partiality and the Nature of Friendship.Jack Warman - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (3):371-388.
Trust, Preemption, and Knowledge.Arnon Keren - 2019 - In Katherine Dormandy, Trust in Epistemology. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-07

Downloads
431 (#116,569)

6 months
34 (#261,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherine Hawley
PhD: Cambridge University; Last affiliation: University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Epistemic Injustice: Phenomena and Theories (Author's preprint - please cite final published version).Aidan McGlynn - 2025 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn, The Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
The Uniqueness Thesis.Matthew Kopec & Michael G. Titelbaum - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (4):189-200.
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility.Neil Levy - 2022 - Social Epistemology 36 (3):283-298.

View all 60 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Epistemic permissiveness.Roger White - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):445–459.
On the epistemic costs of implicit bias.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (1):33-63.
Deciding to trust, coming to believe.Richard Holton - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):63 – 76.

View all 13 references / Add more references