Accounting for the Specious Present: A Defense of Enactivism

Journal of Mind and Behavior 39 (3):181-204 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that conscious visual experience is essentially a non-representational demonstration of a skill. The explication and defense of this position depends on both phenomenological and empirical considerations. The central phenomenological claim is this: as a matter of human psychology, it is impossible to produce a conscious visual experience of a mind-independent object that is sufficiently like typical cases, without including concomitant proprioceptive sensations of the sort of extra-neural behavior that allows us to there and then competently detect such objects. I then argue that this view, which is a version of enactivism, best explains the temporality of conscious experience—what is often called the specious present.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-12

Downloads
715 (#81,372)

6 months
154 (#86,275)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kaplan Hasanoglu
Emmanuel College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations