Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy

Hypatia 22 (4):81-95 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critics have suggested that deliberative democracy reproduces inequalities of gender, race, and class by privileging calm rational discussion over passionate speech and action. Their solution is to supplement deliberation with such forms of emotional expression. Hall argues that deliberation already inherently involves passion, a point that is especially important to recognize in order to deconstruct the dichotomy between reason and passion that plays a central role in reinforcing inequalities of gender, race, and class in the first place.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending deliberation: a comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.James Fishkin - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino.A. R. Oquendo - 2002 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2):189-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
376 (#126,178)

6 months
50 (#168,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration.Peter Goldie - 2000 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology.Robert Campbell Roberts - 2003 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2004 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 41 references / Add more references