Leibniz's Walk-in Machine, Perception, and the Perils of Physicalism

In Mary Lou Maxwell & Wade C. Savage, Science, Mind, and Psychology: Essays in Honor of Grover Maxwell. Upa. pp. 157 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Find it on Amazon.com

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On perception and simplicity: Did Leibniz have Descartes's simple substance in mind?Lesley Cohen - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (S1):85-88.
To walk or not to walk.D. A. Coady & S. Chopra - 2009 - Res Publica (Parkville, Vic.) 18 (1):20-23.
Shades of consciousness.Roderic A. Girle - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):143-57.
Leibniz's account of error.Keya Maitra - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):63 – 73.
Machine perception.Margaret A. Boden - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (74):33-45.
Mills Can't Think: Leibniz's Approach to the Mind-Body Problem.Marleen Rozemond - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (1):1-28.
The perils of physicalism.Joseph Margolis - 1973 - Mind 82 (October):566-578.
Physicalism, externalism and perceptual representation.Howard M. Robinson - 1993 - In Edmond Leo Wright, New Representationalisms: Essays in the Philosophy of Perception. Ashgate.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
1 (#2,388,510)

6 months
1 (#2,177,637)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Keith Gunderson
Keith Gunderson
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references