- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Frogs or Sleepwalkers? Sycophants or Props? A Reply to Schneider on Chatbot Epistemology
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (10):120-127 (2025)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Motivated Reasoning and Partisan Epistemology: A Reply to van Doorn.Keith Harris - forthcoming - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
Becoming less unreasonable: A reply to Sherman.Mark Alfano - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (7):59-62.
Caliphate and the Social Epistemology of Podcasts.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2):27-35.
Adam Smith's Sympathetic Imagination: A Reply to Lennon.Millicent Churcher - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (7):63-68.
A Review of Gulson, Sellar, and Webb’s Algorithms of Education.Daniel Shussett - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5):8-13.
Keeping Successorhood and Inheritance Apart: Reply to Lebens and Ruben.Jonathan D. Payton - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (1):14-19.
Rejected Experts and the Foundations of Epistemic Authority: A Reply to Censon.Charles Lassiter - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (8):54-60.
Considering Purposeful Epistemology: On Starting Over. Review of Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. [REVIEW]Mark D. West - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (9):19-33.
David-Hillel Ruben’s 'Traditions and True Successors': A Critical Reply.John N. Williams - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7):40-45.
On Using Genealogies to Debunk Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Stamatiadis-Bréhier.Nader Shoaibi - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (4):1-6.
Analytics
Added to PP
2025-12-02
Downloads
320 (#139,318)
6 months
185 (#60,647)
2025-12-02
Downloads
320 (#139,318)
6 months
185 (#60,647)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Understanding, Teaching, and Phenomenology in the Age of LLMs: Critical Reply to Malfatti’s ‘ChatGPT, Education, and Understanding'.Jacob Rump - 2026 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
References found in this work
ChatGPT is bullshit.Michael Townsen Hicks, James Humphries & Joe Slater - 2024 - Ethics and Information Technology 26 (2):1-10.
Theater of the Departed: A Conceptual Framework for Chatbots of the Dead.Amy Kurzweil & Daniel Story - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
In the hands of machines? The future of aged care.Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation