The biological objection against strong AI

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the biological objection against strong artificial intelligence (AI), machines cannot have human mindedness – that is, they cannot be conscious, intelligent, sentient, etc. in the precise way that a human being typically is – because this requires being alive, and machines are not alive. Proponents of the objection include John Lucas, Hubert Dreyfus, and John Searle. The present paper explains the nature and significance of the biological objection, before arguing that it currently represents an essentially irrational position.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Can semantics be syntactic?Neal Jahren - 1990 - Synthese 82 (3):309-28.
Boundaries of Imitation: Artificial Intelligence Among “Knowing-That” and “Knowing-How”.Наталя Більчук & Ілля Костров - 2025 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 72:128-138.
Alan Turing and the mathematical objection.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):23-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-19

Downloads
1,474 (#28,601)

6 months
472 (#9,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Turing’s Philosophy of AI.Sebastian Sunday-Grève - 2025 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 56:513-529.
A transcendental argument for AI consciousness.Zhiwei Gu - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind.Evan Thompson - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity Between Life and Language.Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, Elena Clare Cuffari & Hanne De Jaegher - 2018 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press. Edited by Elena Clare Cuffari & Hanne De Jaegher.

View all 46 references / Add more references