- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Everyday argumentation from a speech act perspective
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
Rules for argumentation in dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-291.
Everyday argumentation from an interpretive perspective.Robert Trapp - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit, Readings in argumentation. New York: Foris Publications. pp. 205--218.
Argumentation and speech act theory.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):341-343.
Empirical research on the identification of singular, multiple and subordinate argumentation.R. J. Oostdam - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):223-234.
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
Argumentación y demostración.Alfonso Cabanzo - 2010 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 17:171-185.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-04-05
Downloads
41 (#1,356,145)
6 months
6 (#1,500,269)
2014-04-05
Downloads
41 (#1,356,145)
6 months
6 (#1,500,269)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
?That's not fair!? argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication.Margrit Schreier, Norbert Groeben & Ursula Christmann - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):267-289.
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation