VI The Case of One Person

In Well-being: its meaning, measurement, and moral importance. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press. pp. 93-105 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter is about the measurement of one person's well‐being. Indeed, can it be measured? To answer, we must specify the scale of measurement we are interested in: ordinal, cardinal, if cardinal, then interval or ratio. The chapter argues that there are pockets of cardinality in the measurement of one person's well‐being (cardinal measurement independent of probability, despite what many decision theorists say), and extensive areas of ordinal measurement, and that, in the case of one person, our capacity for measurement usually matches our decision‐making needs—i.e. as far as the measurement of well‐being goes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Capacity for Measurement with a Unit.İsa Kerem Bayırlı - 2025 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 34 (3).
Modern Measurement.Louis Narens & Brian Skyrms - 2020 - In Louis Narens & Brian Skyrms, The Pursuit of Happiness: Philosophical and Psychological Foundations of Utility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 91-105.
The Sum of Well-Being.Jacob M. Nebel - 2023 - Mind 132 (528):1074–1104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
1 (#2,387,199)

6 months
1 (#2,183,676)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references