Fuzzy in 3–D: Two Contrasting Paradigms

Archives for the Philosophy and History of Soft Computing 2015 (2) (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ype-2 fuzzy sets and complex fuzzy sets are both three dimensional extensions of type-1 fuzzy sets. Complex fuzzy sets come in two forms, the standard form, postulated in 2002 by Ramot et al., and the 2011 innovation of pure complex fuzzy sets, proposed by Tamir et al.. In this paper we compare and contrast both forms of complex fuzzy set with type-2 fuzzy sets, as regards their rationales, applications, definitions, and structures. In addition, pure complex fuzzy sets are compared with type-2 fuzzy sets in relation to their inferencing operations. Complex fuzzy sets and type-2 fuzzy sets differ in their roles and applications; complex fuzzy sets are pertinent to inferencing where there is seasonality, and type-2 fuzzy sets are applicable to reasoning under uncertainty. Their definitions differ also, though there is equivalence between those of a pure complex fuzzy set and a type-2 fuzzy set. Structural similarity is evident between these three-dimensional sets. Complex fuzzy sets are represented by a 3–D line, and type-2 fuzzy sets by a 3–D surface, but a surface is simply a generalisation of a line. This similarity is particularly apparent between pure complex fuzzy sets and type-2 fuzzy sets, which are both mappings from the domain onto the unit square. However type-2 fuzzy sets were found not to be isomorphic to pure complex fuzzy sets. The mechanisms by which complex fuzzy sets model and quantify periodicity, and type-2 fuzzy sets model and quantify uncertainty are discussed. A type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of its type-2 embedded set. An embedded type-2 fuzzy set is a type-2 fuzzy set in itself, whose geometrical representation is a 3-D line. Thus, geometrically an embedded type-2 fuzzy set can be seen as equivalent to a pure complex fuzzy set and therefore a type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of a collection pure complex fuzzy sets, which in turn can be regarded as embedded complex fuzzy sets of a type-2 fuzzy set. This relationship is exploited to provide a complex definition of a type-2 fuzzy set.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zbiory rozmyte i operacje na nich.Mieczysław Lubawski - 1978 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 26 (3):77-87.
Complex Fuzzy Sets with Application in BCK/BCI-Algebras.Young Bae Jun & Xiao Long Xin - 2019 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 48 (3):173-185.
Fuzzy Logic in the Broad Sense.Radim Bělohlávek, Joseph W. Dauben & George J. Klir - 2017 - In Radim Bělohlávek, Joseph W. Dauben & George J. Klir, Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics: A Historical Perspective. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 43-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-06

Downloads
4 (#2,256,719)

6 months
4 (#1,748,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fuzzy Sets.Lofti A. Zadeh - 1965 - Information and Control 8 (1):338--53.

Add more references