- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Un chiarimento
Augustinianum 50 (2):575-576 (2010)
Abstract
The Author does not offer a ‘ reply to a reply ’ by Dorothea Weber, but rather a clarification that is useful for the scholar who intends to do research on De vocatione omnium gentium.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Autorenvarianten in Prospers De vocatione omnium gentium? Einige methodische Überlegungen.Dorothea Weber - 2010 - Augustinianum 50 (2):567-573.
Varianti d'autore nel De vocatione omnium gentium attribuito a Prospero d'Aquitania.Franco Gori - 2010 - Augustinianum 50 (1):255-262.
How Not to Save Searle: A Reply to Weber’s Reply.Robert D’Amico & William Butchard - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):445-448.
Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea.Hud Hudson - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452-470.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
60 (#1,003,352)
6 months
13 (#895,072)
2011-01-09
Downloads
60 (#1,003,352)
6 months
13 (#895,072)
Historical graph of downloads
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation