Sensualistischer phänomenalismus und denkökonomie. Zur wissenschaftskonzeption Ernst machs

Abstract

Sensationalistic Phenomenalism and Economy of Thought. On Ernst Mach's Concept of Science. Ernst Mach, natural scientist and major precursor of the Vienna Circle, never wants to be a philosopher. Nevertheless his writings are full of valuable hints for a modern theory of human knowledge – with respect to economical, historical and evolutionary aspects. His kind of phenomenalism is sensationalistic, monistic and instrumentalistic. This article deals with some contributions of his approach to actual debates in the general philosophy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence.Friedrich Stadler (ed.) - 2019 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
Ernst Mach.Frederick C. Beiser - 2024 - In Early German Positivism. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
The Role of Imagination in Ernst Mach’s Philosophy of Science: A Biologico-economical View.Char Brecevic - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (1):241-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
153 (#276,200)

6 months
11 (#1,045,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Perspectival Realist features of Ernst Mach’s critical epistemology.Pietro Gori - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (1):99-124.
Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism.Pietro Gori - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):383-411.
Putnam versus Berkeley?Ralf Goeres - 2007 - Facta Philosophica 9 (1):177-202.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Seele.Dagmar Kiesel & Cleophea Ferrari (eds.) - 2017 - Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge.George Berkeley - 1710 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas J. McCormack.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.George Berkeley - 1713 - New York: G. James. Edited by Jonathan Dancy.
Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff.Ernst Cassirer - 1910 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 18 (6):7-8.

View all 26 references / Add more references