- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?”
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W10-W11 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Catherine Gliwa & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):32-42.
A Perspective From Clinical Providers and Patients: Researchers’ Duty to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings.Kathryn M. Ross & Marian Reiff - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):56-58.
Access to Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.Michelle J. Bayefsky & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):1-3.
Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Is There an Ethical Obligation to Disclose Controversial Risk? A Question From the ACCORD Trial”.Joseph P. DeMarco, Paul J. Ford, Dana J. Patton & Douglas O. Stewart - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):W1 - W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?”.Andrew Garland, Stephanie Morain & Jeremy Sugarman - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):1-3.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “why treat the wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-26
Downloads
79 (#723,934)
6 months
18 (#649,931)
2013-10-26
Downloads
79 (#723,934)
6 months
18 (#649,931)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Catherine Gliwa & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):32-42.
The Duty to Rescue in Genomic Research.Michael Ulrich - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):50-51.
Genomic Incidental Findings: Reducing the Burden to Be Fair.Velizara Anastasova, Alessandro Blasimme, Sophie Julia & Anne Cambon-Thomsen - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):52-54.
Reframing the Ethical Debate Regarding Incidental Findings in Genetic Research.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):44-46.
The Nirvana Fallacy and the Return of Results.Leslie G. Biesecker - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):43-44.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation