Direct and Indirect Acts of Stigmatization

Journal of Social Ontology 5 (1):53-76 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When considering the impact of stigmatization on society, we tend to think of one aspect of stigmatization while ignoring another. Drawing from historical and fictional cases, I argue that acts of stigmatization can be direct or indirect. Acts of direct stigmatization are acts taken by individuals or groups against an entity, while acts of indirect stigmatization are the specific acts taken by potential targets of stigmatization to prevent themselves from becoming victims of direct stigmatization. If we want a full understanding of the impact that stigmatization has on society, then we need to consider the impact of both direct and indirect acts of stigmatization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-09

Downloads
90 (#601,320)

6 months
16 (#710,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Gleason
University of Alabama

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Imperative of Integration.Elizabeth Anderson - 2010 - Princeton University Press.
Racism, Ideology, and Social Movements.Sally Haslanger - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (1):1–22.
Shame, Stigma, and Disgust in the Decent Society.Richard J. Arneson - 2007 - The Journal of Ethics 11 (1):31-63.

View all 6 references / Add more references