The Necessity of the Epochē and Reduction for a Husserlian Phenomenological Science of Psychology

Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 52 (1):1-35 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In adapting Husserl’s philosophical phenomenological method to conduct research in psychology I included Husserl’s two methodical steps, the epochē and the reduction, as part of the scientific procedure. Zahavi objected to my use of those steps. This article is a response to his objections and it is a reaffirmation of the necessity of the epochē and reduction for Husserlian phenomenological psychological research. A description of Husserl’s acknowledged types of psychology and a description of his transcendental phenomenology are also presented along with two outlines of how Husserlian phenomenological research could be conducted.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-28

Downloads
170 (#242,016)

6 months
24 (#403,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Cartesian meditations.Edmund Husserl - 1960 - [The Hague]: M. Nijhoff.
Phenomenology the Basics.Dan Zahavi - 2018 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché.Dan Zahavi - 2019 - Continental Philosophy Review 54 (2):259-273.

View all 15 references / Add more references