Abstract

This master's thesis explores the role of "critical anthropomorphism" within Martin Gorke's framework of holistic environmental ethics. The central question concerns how a shift in perspective can be achieved—one that moves beyond anthropocentric and pathocentric approaches to grant moral considerability to all of nature, including non-living entities. Engaging with Gorke’s concept of nature’s intrinsic value, Alexander Geis develops both a theoretical foundation and a practical articulation of this ethical shift. Critical anthropomorphism is presented as a methodological tool that uses analogy and self-reflection to foster a reflective, empathetic orientation toward the natural world. The thesis examines the epistemological conditions and practical challenges of this approach and discusses its significance for expanding the moral community—even to include artificial entities.