The Truth about Science in the Postmodern Condition

Abstract

Everyone agrees that the Enlightenment hasn’t succeeded—in that the critical rationality associated with modern natural science has not been extended to society at large (and may even have retreated from science itself). Should we be relieved or disappointed that the Enlightenment has failed? I am disappointed but not discouraged by what is called the postmodern condition. But to move forward, we cannot simply deny the presence of the condition, as if it were the collective hallucination of weak minds. This is what Dennett does. I fear that he is in denial rather than disappointment. Only when we are clear about the ideals that we want to promote can we see our way through the postmodern condition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against the politics of postmodern philosophy of science.Dimitri Ginev - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
Knowledge without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
The postmodern political condition.Agnes Heller - 1988 - Cambridge, UK: Polity Press in association with B. Blackwell. Edited by Ferenc Fehér.
Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche.Ashley Woodward - 2002 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):51-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
96 (#546,135)

6 months
15 (#771,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Fuller
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Add more references