- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A New Start For The Humanities Is Required For The 21st Century: A Debate Among Steve Fuller, Ronald Schleifer And Robert Markley
Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 44 (1):109-122 (2009)
Abstract
The international conference Humanities Between Constructivism and Biologism, held at the University of Copenhagen in September 2010, was the forum for an exciting debate between Steve Fuller (Warwick), Ronald Schleifer (Oklahoma), Robert Markley (Illinois) and other scholars. The debate took place at the final session and conveys a number of central messages from the conference, which aim was to encourage interdisciplinarity by bringing together scholars from different humanist disciplines to offer their views on existing practices and ideas regarding the relationship between science and the humanities.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is no Longer Required for Research Purposes: A Debate Between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller.Colin Barron - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):77-99.
R. Schleifer and R. Markley , "Kierkegaard and literature: Irony, repetition, and criticism".S. I. Walsh - 1987 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (2):116.
Modal Power, Self-Conscious Science, and the Critique of Epistemic Paternalism, or How to Change your Mind : An Interview with Steve Fuller.Sharon Rider - 2019 - Disputatio-Philosophical Research Bulletin 8 (11).
Steve Fuller, The Knowledge Book Review. [REVIEW]Francis Remedios - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (5):329-331.
Steve Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. [REVIEW]F. Remedios - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):97-99.
Tug of Love (Review of Kuhn versus Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science).Ray Scott Percival - 2003 - New Scientist (2411).
Remedios and Fuller on normativity and science.Joseph Rouse - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):464-471.
Fuller on Science and Technology Studies.Francis X. Remedios & Val Dusek - 2018 - In Francis X. Remedios & Val Dusek, Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller’s Social Epistemology. London, UK: Palgrave. pp. 9-30.
Bringing critique back to the philosophy of science.Petri Ylikoski - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):321-324.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-26
Downloads
95 (#554,050)
6 months
39 (#219,990)
2013-12-26
Downloads
95 (#554,050)
6 months
39 (#219,990)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Frankfurt School, Science and Technology Studies, and the Humanities.Finn Collin & David Budtz Pedersen - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (1):44-72.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation