The costs and benefits of a separation of powers - an incomplete contracts approach

Abstract

The separation of the legislative, executive and judiciary powers is a key principle in most democratic constitutions. We analyze the costs and benefits of separating legislature and executive in an incomplete contracts model: The executive can decide to implement public projects. Under separation of powers, the legislature sets up a decision-making framework that leaves the executive with the residual decision-making rights. Separation of powers is the more beneficial, the larger the danger of extreme policy preferences of the residual political decision-maker.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Separation of Powers: Introduction to the Study of Executive Agreements.Gary J. Schmitt - 1982 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 27 (1):114-138.
Governmental functions and the specification of rights.Cosmin Vraciu - 2021 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (4):654-674.
Separation of Powers.Kevin Y. L. Tan - 2024 - In Sujit Choudhry, Michaela Hailbronner & Mattias Kumm, Global Canons in an Age of Contestation: Debating Foundational Texts of Constitutional Democracy and Human Rights. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law.C. L. Ten - 2012 - In Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit & Thomas W. Pogge, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 493–502.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-17

Downloads
43 (#1,315,496)

6 months
8 (#1,301,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references